User talk:Doomhiker

Welcome aboard, Doomhiker Results May Vary (talk) 13:23, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Just to be sure we do't skip anything, let's start from the first couple games before getting to the later ones. Since earlier games usually have less content anyway, it'll also be easier that way too. Granted, the original Four Swords has less stuff in it than....pretty much any other Zelda game.... Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 17:00, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Autoconfirmed

 * Just letting you know that I set autoconfirmed rank as a security measure against possible vandals. I disabled it for the moment so that you can have the ability to create pages & such, but I will reenable it by tomorrow, when you've had an account for at least one day (the criteria is 1 day + 5 edits for every user, same as on WiKirby). Results May Vary (talk) 17:35, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Re: I am Error
Yeah well there's a lot of information i put into the article (based on Wikipedia version but with a rewrite), regarding notable outlets and official acknowledgements from Nintendo. I actually imagined summarizing "I am Error" on the list of zelda internet referencesand linking to the main article from there. Since the article is pretty long, how would we go about truncating it for such an article (and what information would stay and which would be removed)? Results May Vary (talk) 00:20, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I moved Model A to the "List of The Legend of Zelda references on the Internet" article Results May Vary (talk) 01:29, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Re:TLOZ board game
Oh. Well it should probably be moved to Milton Bradley, because there is also a Japanese Bandai-made board game, and I think listing the creators would be better than having a "board game" identifier for both "The Legend of Zelda" and "Zelda no Densetsu." Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 00:14, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Identifiers should be used to lessen confusion in each individual situation. If the potential point of confusion is the company, that needs to be the identifier. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 00:22, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Re:Bubble/Fire Faeries
Because they're called Bubbles in Japanese, hence the Shudan Bubble. As for the English name, it's from the NP guide. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 18:15, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Ask LTL, the only game-specific non-instruction-manual guide I physically own is the TFH one. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 18:20, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The Bubble is named "Fire Faerie" on page 110 of the A Link to the Past Nintendo Power guide, "Anti-Faerie" at least on page 101 of the Link's Awakening Nintendo Power guide (the guide still refers to fairies as Faeries) and on page 33 of the The Legend of Zelda: Oracle of Seasons/Ages Nintendo Power guide (despite referring to regular fairies as fairies), and "Anti-Fairy" on page 48 of the A Link to the Past/Four Swords Nintendo Power guide. As for whether or not they are really Bubbles, they are 「バブル」(Baburu, Bubble) and 「集団バブル」(Shūdan Baburu, "Mass Bubble") on page 134 of the first part of the Kamigami no Triforce Shogakukan guide. LTL (talk) 13:03, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Whole titles in the middle of body paragraphs
Really, please stop that until more consensus is reached. When the unique part of the title is just the subtitle, referring to each game by the whole overly-long title every single time just bloats things up unnecessarily and reads really awkwardly. We are not copying MarioWiki's rules wholesale, just the ones that really can realistically apply to this franchise. Which is most, but not all. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 20:53, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * That's not what I mean, I mean like Link's Awakening. Adding the full TLoZ to the front is just awkward and takes up unnecessary space. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 21:28, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * A part of the title shared with every other game in the series (barring the one that's an underrated classic). It's really just clunky and unnecessary, especially when we're mentioning the even-longer-titled ports/remakes in the same section. The GBA ALttP is where I ultimately draw the line with that. There is no reason to mention its whole title twice in the same sentence. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 21:34, 1 September 2019 (UTC)