Talk:The Legend of Zelda: Hyrule Historia

Based on what LTL told me, should we base the article on this image? It's a fanmade image, so we shouldn't implement it into the article, but it's based on the original Hyrule Hystoria book, which LTL advised to me is the most reliable Results May Vary (talk) 17:02, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Should we even make a Zelda Timeline article? It changes often, is confusing, and is not really worty of an article anyways, since it is not in-game, with games often being treated separately with each other except when it is a direct sequel such as with OOT and MM. Doomhiker (talk) 17:43, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

I mean it's not like we can say the controversy does not exist. How would we go about that? Results May Vary (talk) 17:54, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

I was thinking either we split the content into two main sections (one for Hyrule Historia and the other for additions and revisions, which would reference Nintendo's Twitter and official website but not the other two books for the reasons I already mentioned) or just move the timeline information into a Hyrule Historia article instead of having it as a separate page. LTL (talk) 17:55, 17 May 2019 (UTC)